This
week we wrote an in-class essay on an amusing anecdote of a child’s struggle
with wrongdoing. Although at the time I
was frantically focused on composing an AP student-worthy masterpiece (only Ms.
V knows how successful I was with that), I can now allow my mind reign to
ruminate over the central message of Soto’s story. The connotative diction and
vivid imagery he uses show how the irresistibly “sweet” immediate effects of
sin serenaded his not-yet-matured six-year-old senses, gently detaching him
from the whispers of his tugging conscience. Soto portrays himself as caught in
a “sticky” web of guilt, unable to distinguish between the pleasure and
abhorrence of sin as they continually morph and transpose, until he finally
concludes that sin is, essentially, “what you took and didn’t give back.”
Allow
me to present a more articulate definition.
A wise
person once said, “Sin is what causes uneasiness in your heart and what you
dislike others to become aware of.” The first part of this concise yet comprehensive statement
has to do with the innate gauge and inherent notion of goodness that exists
within every human being. When a person breaks this notion, their inner gauge picks it up as a warning sign and alerts them that
something is not right. In a similar vein, think about the second characteristic
mentioned. If you have to quickly switch tabs when you hear your parents at the
door, shove the phone in your pocket when the teacher passes by, or minimize
the window when your boss steps in, you’re probably doing something you shouldn’t
be.
It’s
crucial that we respond to the disturbances in our heart by leaving and
reversing what’s wrong; if we suppress them, our gauge will eventually dim out
and cease to function—leaving us lost, as young Soto was, in a haze of pleasure
and peccancy.
Huda, what an interesting topic! I didn't even think to talk about the essay we wrote this week. I also enjoyed the breakdown of your quote and thought it was very well analyzed.
ReplyDelete